“Garbage in, garbage out”—this age-old axiom in machine learning rings truer than ever in the age of LLMs. No matter how advanced a model may be, its performance hinges on the quality of the data it consumes.
Building effective machine learning solutions often requires extensive data gathering, cleaning, and labeling, especially when faced with frequent data drift (i.e., where the underlying data distribution shifts over time). Typically, this means frequently retraining models to keep up with new information, which can be a time-consuming and resource-intensive process.
Enter RAG-Based LLMs
Solving this data drift challenge for generative AI models has become easier because of the emergence of RAG or Retrieval-Augmented Generation. RAG for LLMs combines the generative capabilities of LLMs with external data retrieval mechanisms, pulling in relevant documents or data points from external sources to enhance their responses.
This significantly improves the quality and factual accuracy of LLM outputs, making it especially valuable in dynamic fields where data changes frequently. Studies have shown that RAG architectures can improve answer accuracy and reduce hallucination rates in LLMs, as demonstrated in research by Lewis et al. (2020), where models enhanced by retrieval mechanisms delivered more precise and contextually rich responses compared to traditional LLMs. RAG also enables LLMs to perform better in specialized domains, as models can access up-to-date information, enhancing user trust and reducing the need for frequent retraining.
These advantages are now leading some engineers to try adapting non-generative models into RAG-based LLMs—a choice that often presents more challenges than benefits.
The Problem With Adapting Non-Generative Models into LLMs
Non-generative models are purpose-built for specific, task-oriented functions—like classification or regression—rather than for text generation or interpreting natural language context. Converting them into LLMs not only strains computational resources but can degrade task performance, diluting their efficiency, accuracy, and stability. The drawbacks fall into five main areas:
- Performance Degradation: Transforming models optimized for structured data or specific applications into LLMs can reduce task performance and efficiency, as LLMs struggle to handle non-textual data formats.
- High Computational Costs: Adding LLM layers requires more memory, demanding hardware, and scaling costs, alongside the complexities of maintenance and retraining.
- Increased Latency: Real-time applications with rapid processing needs, like fraud detection or autonomous navigation, can be slowed by the extra retrieval steps in RAG-based LLMs.
- Reduced Interpretability: LLMs function as black boxes, limiting transparency—an issue in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance.
- Risk of Hallucination: LLMs can “hallucinate” ungrounded outputs, while non-generative models remain reliable within defined decision boundaries and curated training data.
That said, in some cases, adapting to RAG-based LLMs is beneficial—particularly for tasks requiring nuanced language understanding or dynamic context retrieval. Applications like customer support, document summarization, and sentiment analysis can benefit from this combination, as can systems that rely on evolving information, like news analysis or financial tracking.
When RAG-Based LLMs Add Complexity Without Benefit
For many tasks, however, RAG-based LLMs add unnecessary complexity:
Discriminative Models: Models designed to classify or predict from structured inputs—like fraud detection—rarely benefit from RAG, as the extra layers don’t enhance classification accuracy.
Structured Data Tasks: RAG works best with unstructured text, while tasks involving tabular or time-series data are often better served by traditional models that directly learn from numerical patterns.
Real-Time Processing: RAG-based systems add retrieval steps, creating latency unsuitable for real-time applications like autonomous driving, where speed is crucial.
When Non-Generative Models Need External Context
For scenarios where non-generative models need external context without LLM overhead, solutions like Orca offer a “RAG for non-generative models” approach. By updating models with relevant, real-time context through periodic tuning, Orca keeps them adaptable to data drift without the resource burden of an LLM. Orca also allows automated data updates and flexible configurations, enabling continuous tuning without overhauling a simple classifier or predictor.
RAG Has Its Place—But It's Not Universal
RAG-based LLMs are powerful in specific contexts, especially where unstructured or rapidly changing information is required, like in customer support chatbots. But for tasks focused on predictions, classifications, or structured data, simpler models often outperform RAG by staying streamlined and efficient. In the rush to embrace new AI tools, it’s essential to match the model to the task, and sometimes, a well-optimized traditional model is the best solution. Solutions like Orca provide a balanced approach, letting non-generative models stay current without unnecessary complexity.
.png)
